Time limit for IT assessment orders calculated from original assessment date, not reassessment. Commissioner's actions under Section 263 time-barred.

The Supreme Court held that the limitation for passing an order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act should be calculated from the date of the original assessment order, not the reassessment order. The Court emphasized that when reassessment is distinct and different from the original assessment, the limitation period starts from the original assessment order. Consequently, the Court found the Commissioner's actions under Section 263 were time-barred, affirming the decisions of the ITAT and High Court, and dismissing the appeal.

---

---

Issues:
The judgment deals with the issue of the period of limitation for passing an order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Supreme Court considered whether the limitation for passing an order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 should be calculated from the date of the original assessment order or from the date of the reassessment order. The Court noted that the Commissioner exercised powers under Section 263 with respect to issues not covered in the reassessment proceedings. Therefore, the issues before the Commissioner related back to the original assessment order, and the limitation would start from the original assessment order, not the reassessment order. The Court cited the decision in Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai v. Alagendran Finance Ltd. (2007) 7 SCC 215 to support this view. The Court emphasized that when an assessment order is reopened, the previous order is set aside, and the proceedings start afresh. However, this does not mean that the entire assessment proceedings are reopened when the subject matter of reassessment is distinct and different. The relevant date for determining the limitation for exercising powers under Section 263 would be the date of the original assessment order if the subject matter of reassessment is distinct and different.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court found that the proceedings under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act by the Commissioner were rightly held as barred by limitation. The Court upheld the decisions of the ITAT and the High Court in dismissing the appeal. Therefore, the Court dismissed the present appeal based on the facts and circumstances of the case and the legal principles discussed.

---