TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the appellant is entitled to interest on the amount of Rs.26,06,282 (deposited during investigation on 01.07.2008) for the period 01.07.2008 to 31.10.2012; (ii) Whether the appellant is entitled to interest from date of deposit (beyond 31.10.2012) on amounts treated as pre-deposit under Section 35F/35FF and, if so, the applicable commencement date and rate.
Issue (i): Entitlement to interest on Rs.26,06,282 for the period 01.07.2008 to 31.10.2012.
Analysis: The Tribunal examined the factual chronology showing the amount was deposited during investigation and was retained by the department without authority until the stay order of CESTAT dated 31.10.2012; it considered precedent holding that amounts retained without authority attract interest and the interplay of statutory interest provisions, notably Section 11BB. The Commissioner (Appeals) had allowed interest on Rs.26,06,282 for the period 01.07.2008 to 31.10.2012 and Revenue did not challenge that part of the order.
Conclusion: The appellant is entitled to interest on Rs.26,06,282 for the period 01.07.2008 to 31.10.2012 (in appellant's favour for this issue).
Issue (ii): Entitlement to interest from date of deposit for amounts treated as pre-deposit after 31.10.2012 and the applicable commencement date and rate.
Analysis: The Tribunal analysed Section 35FF (and the proviso preserving pre-amendment treatment for deposits made prior to 06.08.2014) and Section 11BB/11B scheme, and recent high court and Supreme Court authorities (including Willowood/Gujarat Fluoro/Gujarat precedent) to conclude that where the statute prescribes the manner and commencement of statutory interest, courts must apply the statutory starting point (interest under Section 11BB/35FF runs subject to three month rule/communication or application as specified). The Tribunal held that amounts which attained identity as pre-deposit on or after the stay are governed by Section 35FF and interest entitlement must be determined in accordance with that statutory framework; the appellant's broader claim to interest from the original date of deposit (beyond the period identified above) was not sustainable.
Conclusion: The appellant is not entitled to interest from the original date of deposit for the period after 31.10.2012 beyond the interest already allowed by Commissioner (Appeals); the claim for interest from date of deposit for pre-deposit sums beyond the admitted period is rejected (against the appellant on this issue).
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal dismissed the appeal overall while noting the Commissioner (Appeals) award of interest in favour of the appellant for Rs.26,06,282 for 01.07.2008 to 31.10.2012 must be implemented; the appellant's remaining claims for interest from date of deposit were not accepted and the appeal is dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute prescribes the entitlement and commencement of interest on delayed refunds (Sections 11B/11BB and Section 35FF read with the proviso), the statutory starting point and rate govern the award; amounts retained without authority prior to acquiring the character of statutory pre-deposit attract compensatory interest for that period, but once treated as pre-deposit interest entitlement must be determined in accordance with Section 35FF/11BB and the three month/communication or application rules contained therein.
TaxTMI 
