Structured written submissions must be issue-wise, concise and supported by record references to assist judicial decision-making.

Written submissions in civil proceedings must be concise, issue-wise and structured to assist effective adjudication: they should identify the points for decision, state admitted and disputed facts briefly, set out the governing statute before case law, answer rival contentions, and conclude with a short summing up. The order also requires page references to the record and placitums in reported judgments for verification, a brief factual resume of important precedents, identification of the ratio decidendi, and highlighted copies of relied-upon materials. Submissions are to be kept within five pages and filed in the prescribed format; the matter was directed to be listed on the next date.

---

---

Issues: Whether written submissions in civil proceedings should be structured to assist the Court, identify the points for decision, set out the governing law and relevant case law, answer the rival contentions, and include page references to the record.

Analysis: The order emphasises that written arguments are meant to aid effective adjudication and should not consist of a mere list of authorities or an unstructured narrative. It requires a brief statement of dates, admitted and disputed facts, formulated points or issues, separate arguments issue-wise where appropriate, the applicable statute first, then relevant case law arranged in a principled order, a brief factual resume of important precedents, identification of the ratio decidendi, an answer to the opposing case, and a summing up. It also directs that page numbers and placitums of the record and reported judgments be provided for ready verification, and that the submissions remain concise and within five pages, with highlighted copies of the relevant materials attached.

Conclusion: Written submissions are to be filed in the prescribed structured form, within the page limit, with supporting copies and references highlighted, and the matter was directed to be listed on the next date.

Final Conclusion: The order is procedural in nature and lays down the format and content expected in written submissions for the further hearing of the matter.

Ratio Decidendi: Written submissions must be concise, issue-wise, properly structured, and supported by relevant statutory law, authorities, and record references so that they meaningfully assist the Court.

---