Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order rejecting the objection under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was sustainable when it contained no reasons and did not deal with the objection, and whether the matter had to be decided afresh after hearing the assessee.
Analysis: The objection raised by the assessee was not considered on merits and the impugned communication merely stated that the Form 2A intimation was correct. An order that rejects a statutory objection without disclosing reasons does not show application of mind and fails the requirement that conclusions must be supported by reasons. In such a situation, the correctness of the tax determination was not examined on merits, and the proper course was to set aside the order and require a fresh decision after affording a hearing.
Conclusion: The rejection order was unsustainable and was set aside. The authority was directed to decide the objection afresh after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing and, if the objection was rejected, to record reasons.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded in obtaining setting aside of the impugned rejection and a remand for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory order rejecting an objection must be a reasoned order showing application of mind and, where reasons are absent, the order is liable to be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision after hearing the affected party.