<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 744 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465912</link>
    <description>An order rejecting an assessee&#039;s objection under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was unsustainable because it gave no reasons and did not deal with the objection on merits. A statutory decision must disclose application of mind and support its conclusion with reasons; a bare statement that the Form 2A intimation was correct was insufficient. The HC set aside the rejection and remitted the matter for fresh consideration after affording the assessee a hearing, with directions to record reasons if the objection is again rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 12:22:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 744 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465912</link>
      <description>An order rejecting an assessee&#039;s objection under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme was unsustainable because it gave no reasons and did not deal with the objection on merits. A statutory decision must disclose application of mind and support its conclusion with reasons; a bare statement that the Form 2A intimation was correct was insufficient. The HC set aside the rejection and remitted the matter for fresh consideration after affording the assessee a hearing, with directions to record reasons if the objection is again rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>