Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit in respect of metal containers was required to be reversed and duty was payable on empty drums or containers cleared from the factory when the inputs were received in such containers.
Analysis: The question turned on whether empty drums or barrels could be treated as waste arising out of the manufacturing process so as to attract duty under the Modvat scheme. Rule 57F dealt with waste arising out of the manufacturing process, but there was no specific rule levying duty on drums, barrels or containers in which inputs were received. The absence of a specific levy, together with the view already taken that such containers were not waste generated by manufacture, meant that duty could not be demanded on their clearance.
Conclusion: The liability to reverse Modvat credit or pay duty on the empty containers was negatived, and the appeal of the Revenue failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of a specific charging provision, empty containers in which inputs are received cannot be treated as waste arising out of the manufacturing process for the purpose of demanding duty under the Modvat scheme.