Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty was payable on waste and scrap arising from packing materials, and whether the matter required re-examination for proper quantification.
Analysis: The dispute related to clearances of waste and scrap of corrugated boxes, plastic bags, paper tubes, bobbins and craft paper. It was accepted that no duty was payable on waste arising from packing materials of inputs. However, where packing materials had been procured on payment of duty for packing of intermediate or final goods and such materials had become scrap, duty could be attracted on their clearance. The record did not clearly show how much waste related to input packing materials and how much related to duty-paid packing materials used for other goods, so the quantification issue needed verification by the adjudicating authority.
Conclusion: The demand could not be finally sustained or rejected on the existing record, and the matter had to be re-examined for re-quantification after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the proceedings were sent back for fresh determination of the duty demand on the identified waste and scrap.
Ratio Decidendi: Duty on scrap from packing materials depends on whether the materials were used as input packing materials or were duty-paid packing materials used for packing other goods, and the liability must be determined on proper factual quantification.