Excise duty on scrap requires proof of manufacture-linked generation or identifiable duty-credit capital goods.

Waste and scrap of iron and steel were not shown to be excisable because the Department failed to establish that the scrap arose from the manufacturing process or from identifiable capital goods on which Modvat credit had been taken. The record indicated that the scrap was linked to construction activity rather than manufacture, and the show cause notice and order did not explain how the scrap was generated from modvatable inputs or from which capital goods it emerged. Rule 57S(2)(C) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was also not attracted, as there was no proof that capital goods sold as scrap were covered by that provision. The demand was not sustainable and the impugned order was set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the waste and scrap of iron and steel cleared by the assessee was chargeable to central excise duty.

Analysis: Duty on waste under Rule 57F of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was payable only where the waste arose in the course of manufacture. The show cause notice and the order did not identify the manner in which the scrap was generated from modvatable inputs or specify the capital goods from which the scrap emerged. The assessee manufactured tyres and tubes, and the record indicated that the scrap was connected with construction activity rather than with any manufacturing process. Rule 57S(2)(C) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was also not attracted because the Department did not establish that any capital goods on which Modvat credit had been taken were sold as scrap. The packing material aspect also did not support dutiability.

Conclusion: The scrap was not shown to be excisable and the demand could not be sustained.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed on merits in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Waste or scrap can be subjected to excise duty only when the Department establishes that it arose from the manufacturing process or from identifiable duty-credit capital goods, and mere assertion of scrap clearance is insufficient.

---