TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to re-export the imported goods detained by the customs authorities.
Analysis: The goods were detained on the ground of non-compliance with the Food Safety and Standards (Packaging and Labelling) Regulations, 2011. The request for fresh inspection and verification was not accepted, and the petitioner limited the relief to permission to re-export the detained goods. The Court held that re-export could be permitted, provided the petitioner complied with the statutory formalities applicable to re-export.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to re-export the detained goods after complying with the requisite statutory formalities, and the respondents were directed to permit re-export without delay.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
