We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
<h1>Re-export of imported food goods detained for 2011 packaging and labelling non-compliance allowed after statutory formalities completed.</h1> The dominant issue was whether goods detained for non-compliance with the Food Safety and Standards (Packaging and Labelling) Regulations, 2011 could be ... Detention of dates imported by the petitioner for want of non compliance of Food Safety and Standards (Packaging and Labelling) Regulations, 2011 - request to permit for re-export the goods detained - HELD THAT:- This Court is of the view that the petitioner can be permitted to re-export the goods imported by him, as covered by Ext.P2, after complying with all the statutory formalities in relation to re- export. If such request is made, the respondents shall permit the petitioner to re-export, without any further delay. The petition is disposed of. Dates imported from Saudi Arabia were detained for 'non compliance of Food Safety and Standards (Packaging and Labelling) Regulations, 2011,' based on a rejection report (Ext.P4). The petitioner sought to quash Ext.P4 and requested a direction to send the dates for 'inspection and verification' by an authorised officer to determine fitness for human consumption. The respondents opposed, contending 'there is no provision in the regulations under the relevant Act or Rules for such inspection and verification.' In response, the petitioner confined relief to permission to re-export the detained goods. The Court held that the petitioner may be permitted to re-export the goods covered by Ext.P2, subject to 'complying with all the statutory formalities in relation to re-export.' It directed that, upon such request, the authorities 'shall permit the petitioner to re-export, without any further delay.'
TaxTMI 
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
