Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delay of three days in remitting the amount payable under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 could be treated as compliance in view of the Supreme Court's directions excluding the COVID-19 period for limitation purposes.
Analysis: The petitioner had been issued a declaration under the scheme permitting settlement on payment of the quantified amount. The payment fell due during the period affected by the nationwide lockdown and disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Supreme Court's directions in the suo motu limitation proceedings excluded the period from 15.03.2020 to 14.03.2021 for computing limitation and recognised the effect of the pandemic on time-bound legal compliance. In that context, the short delay in remittance was held not to defeat the object of the settlement scheme.
Conclusion: The delay could not be used to deny the petitioner the benefit of the scheme, and the payment made on 03.07.2020 was to be treated as sufficient compliance.