Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the noticee satisfied the 'fit and proper person' criteria for grant of registration as a commodity derivatives broker and whether the application for registration was liable to be rejected.
Analysis: The proceeding was decided under the Intermediaries Regulations and the Stock Brokers Regulations, with the fit and proper test under Schedule II forming the governing standard. The record showed that, although there was no evidence that the noticee had directly facilitated paired contracts, the amended criteria specifically treated a pending criminal complaint and a pending FIR arising from SEBI's complaint as disqualifying factors. In view of those subsisting proceedings, the noticee incurred the relevant disqualification under the amended Schedule II and failed the statutory eligibility test for registration.
Conclusion: The noticee did not satisfy the fit and proper person criteria and the application for registration was rightly rejected.