Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of motor vehicle components transferred from the assessee's factory to its own units was required to be determined under section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the basis of ascertainable normal price, or under section 4(1)(b) of that Act on the footing that no normal price was ascertainable.
Analysis: Section 4(1)(a) governs valuation where excisable goods are ordinarily sold in wholesale trade and the normal price is ascertainable. The proviso to section 4(1)(a) does not create an exception merely because the assessee sells the same goods to different classes of buyers at different prices. Such differential pricing does not make the price unascertainable. Section 4(1)(b) applies only where the normal price is not ascertainable because the goods are not sold or for some other reason. On the facts, the assessee admittedly sold the components in the market at a price and therefore an ascertainable price existed. The mere fact that some components were transferred to sister units on stock transfer basis did not displace the applicability of section 4(1)(a). Consequently, valuation under section 4(1)(b) and the Valuation Rules did not arise.
Conclusion: The components transferred to the assessee's own units were liable to be valued under section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and not under section 4(1)(b).
Ratio Decidendi: Differential sale prices to different classes of buyers do not render the normal price unascertainable; section 4(1)(b) applies only where no ascertainable normal price exists.