Captive consumption valuation follows ascertainable market price from direct sales, while penalty was unwarranted on a normal-period demand.

Where captively consumed goods are predominantly used in-house but a small quantity is sold directly in the market, their valuation should be based on the ascertainable market price reflected in those direct sales, and recourse to Section 4(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not warranted. The duty demand was sustained on that valuation basis. On penalty, where the duty demand fell within the normal period and no further aggravating facts were shown, penalty was not justified and was deleted.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the value of goods captively consumed was to be determined on the basis of the market price reflected in direct sales, and whether Section 4(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be applied; (ii) Whether penalty was sustainable where the duty demand fell within the normal period.

Issue (i): Whether the value of goods captively consumed was to be determined on the basis of the market price reflected in direct sales, and whether Section 4(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could be applied.

Analysis: The goods were predominantly captively consumed, but a small portion was sold directly in the market, making the price ascertainable. In such a situation, the valuation of captively consumed goods had to be based on the market price evidenced by direct sales, and the basis for invoking Section 4(1)(b) did not arise.

Conclusion: The demand of duty was upheld and the assessee failed on the valuation issue.

Issue (ii): Whether penalty was sustainable where the duty demand fell within the normal period.

Analysis: Since the duty demand was within the normal period, the facts did not justify the imposition of penalty.

Conclusion: The penalty was set aside in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The duty demand was sustained on the valuation issue, but the penalty was deleted, resulting in a partial allowance of the appeals.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the price of captively consumed goods is ascertainable from direct market sales, valuation must be based on that market price and penalty is not warranted merely because duty is demanded within the normal period.

---