Review jurisdiction is limited to correcting narrow errors; a remand order will not be reopened for a different merits outcome.

Review jurisdiction is confined to correcting a narrow category of errors and cannot be used as an appeal in disguise. The High Court noted that the earlier order had remanded the matter to the NCLT for fresh consideration after taking account of the BIFR order, which had not been considered previously. As no error or other basis for interference was shown, the court found no ground to reopen the remand order. The review request was therefore rejected and the review application dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order remanding the matter to the National Company Law Tribunal warranted review.

Analysis: Review lies within a narrow compass and cannot be used as an appeal in disguise. The earlier order had remanded the matter for fresh consideration by the Tribunal after taking into account the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction order, which had not been considered earlier. No ground was made out to show error or other basis for interference with that order.

Conclusion: The request for review was rejected and the review application was dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: Review jurisdiction is confined to correcting a limited category of errors and cannot be invoked to reopen a remand order merely because a party seeks a different outcome on merits.

---