TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Petition dismissed, confirming claimants qualify under earlier SFIS policy and scrips granted up to 2007-08 cannot be recovered</h1> <h3>THYSSENKRUPP INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIOS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.</h3> The SC dismissed the petition, upholding the HC's determination that the claimants fall within the earlier SFIS policy framework and that authorities may ... Entitlement to the Duty Credit scrip under the Served From India Scheme - Denial on the ground that Petitioner is promoting 'Thyssenkrupp' brand which is not an Indian brand and that Petitioner is not an Indian service provider - it was held by High Court that 'it will not be permissible for the authorities adjudicating the claims or issues arising therefrom to recover from the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.1755 of 2014 and all petitioners the SFIS benefits granted till 2007-08. They are clearly falling within earlier policy framework and to that extent all petitions succeed.' HELD THAT:- Petition dismissed. The Supreme Court considered the petition on hearing and rendered a final disposition: the petition was 'Dismissed.' The Court expressly disposed of any 'Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.' No respondent counsel appeared. The order is a concise adjudication without extended reasons on the record; the operative outcome is the dismissal of the petition and the simultaneous resolution of ancillary or interlocutory applications. The decision therefore leaves in place the impugned position or lower-court/state of proceedings as of the time of dismissal, subject to any statutory or procedural remedies available post-dismissal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
