Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Special Leave Petition treated as withdrawn and related application dismissed; impleading applicant granted liberty to pursue remedies afresh</h1> In SC, a Special Leave Petition seeking intervention was treated as withdrawn and the application dismissed as withdrawn. The court granted liberty to the ... Seeking intervention in this Special Leave Petition may be permitted to be withdrawn - HELD THAT:- The application is dismissed as withdrawn - However, liberty is reserved to the impleading applicant to seek remedies in accordance with law before the appropriate forum. The Court noted that the relied-upon judgment in the impugned order (Naman Hotel & Others v. Union of India) had already been assailed before this Court in SLP (C) No. 29742 of 2015, which was dismissed on 30.10.2015, and that Review Petition No.4029 of 2015 was dismissed on 28.01.2016. In view of those earlier dismissals, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, invoking the 'principle of judicial consistency and discipline.' An interlocutory application for intervention (IA No.92929 of 2023) was permitted to be withdrawn and was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty reserved to the impleading applicant to 'seek remedies in accordance with law before the appropriate forum.' All pending applications were disposed of. In a separate Writ Petition (Civ) No.1373/2019, the petitioner was granted liberty to file a writ under Article 226 before the Bombay High Court, to be considered 'on its own merits and in accordance with law.'