Special Leave Petition dismissed for gross 220-day delay; condonation reasons legally insufficient and application refused under precedent SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition for gross delay of 220 days in filing; the reasons for condonation were held legally insufficient and ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Special Leave Petition dismissed for gross 220-day delay; condonation reasons legally insufficient and application refused under precedent
SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition for gross delay of 220 days in filing; the reasons for condonation were held legally insufficient and unsatisfactory, so the application to condone delay was refused. Consequent to that refusal and by application of the court's prior ruling on similar issues, the Special Leave Petition itself was dismissed.
There is a gross delay of 220 days in filing this Special Leave Petition. The reasons assigned for seeking condonation of delay are neither satisfactory nor sufficient in law so as to condone the same. Hence, the application seeking condonation of delay is dismissed. Following the order dated 22.08.2025 passed in SLP(C) Diary No. 38044/2025 (The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors. vs. Orange 78 Rule Olivaier De Serrs Paris (France) & Anr.), "the Special Leave Petition is also dismissed." Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. The decision rests on procedural grounds-failure to satisfactorily justify delay-rather than merits of the underlying controversy, and applies the precedent cited as the basis for refusal of relief.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
