Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (1) TMI 1727 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Trust wins section 11 exemption on 15% gross receipts calculation and depreciation allowance for pre-2015 assessment years ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the assessee trust on two key issues regarding section 11 exemption. First, the tribunal held that 15% exemption under ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Trust wins section 11 exemption on 15% gross receipts calculation and depreciation allowance for pre-2015 assessment years

                          ITAT Kolkata ruled in favor of the assessee trust on two key issues regarding section 11 exemption. First, the tribunal held that 15% exemption under section 11(1) applies to gross receipts, not net receipts, as the provision specifically states "15% of the income." Second, regarding depreciation expenses, the tribunal allowed depreciation while calculating application of funds, citing SC precedent that Finance Act 2014 amendments prohibiting depreciation allowance are prospective from AY 2015-16. Since the assessment year was 2012-13, the amendment did not apply. The assessee's appeal was allowed.




                          1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

                          The core legal questions considered by the Tribunal in this appeal are:

                          (a) Whether the exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should be allowed at 15% on the gross receipts of the trust (Rs. 2,91,60,237/-) or on the net receipts (Rs. 3,47,60,989/-) as computed by the Assessing Officer.

                          (b) Whether depreciation expenses should be allowed as a deduction while calculating the application of funds under Section 11, considering the amendment by the Finance Act, 2014, which prohibits depreciation allowance w.e.f. assessment year 2015-16, whereas the assessment year in question is 2012-13.

                          2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                          Issue (a): Allowance of 15% exemption under Section 11 on Gross Receipts or Net Receipts

                          Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act provides exemption for income derived from property held under trust wholly or partly for charitable or religious purposes. The exemption is allowed to the extent income is applied to such purposes, and income accumulated or set apart for such purposes is not in excess of 15% of the income from such property. The provision explicitly refers to "15% of the income," which is interpreted as gross income derived from the property.

                          Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal examined the literal wording of Section 11(1), emphasizing that the exemption is to be calculated on "income" derived from the property, which is understood as gross income or gross receipts, not net income after certain deductions. The Assessing Officer had allowed the 15% exemption on net receipts (Rs. 3,47,60,989/-), which was less favorable to the assessee than allowing it on gross receipts (Rs. 2,91,60,237/-). The Tribunal noted that the statutory language clearly contemplates the exemption as a percentage of gross income.

                          Key evidence and findings: The factual matrix shows that the gross receipts from microfinance activity were Rs. 2,91,60,237/-, while the net receipts after adjustments were Rs. 3,47,60,989/-. The Assessing Officer's calculation of exemption on net receipts was challenged by the assessee.

                          Application of law to facts: Applying the statutory provision literally, the Tribunal found that the exemption under Section 11(1) must be computed on gross income. Therefore, the Assessing Officer's approach was incorrect, and the exemption should be calculated on gross receipts.

                          Treatment of competing arguments: The Assessing Officer's approach was presumably based on considering net receipts as "income" for exemption calculation. The Tribunal rejected this interpretation, holding that the statutory text and intent favor gross income as the base for exemption.

                          Conclusion: The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow the 15% exemption on gross receipts as per Section 11(1) of the Act.

                          Issue (b): Allowance of Depreciation while Calculating Application of Funds under Section 11

                          Relevant legal framework and precedents: Section 11 allows deduction for income applied to charitable or religious purposes. The Finance Act, 2014, amended Section 11(1) to prohibit allowance of depreciation from assessment year 2015-16 onwards. The Supreme Court in Rajasthan Gujrati Charitable Foundation (2018) 402 ITR 441 (SC) held that this amendment is prospective and does not apply to assessment years prior to 2015-16.

                          Court's interpretation and reasoning: Since the assessment year under consideration is 2012-13, prior to the effective date of the amendment, the Tribunal held that the amendment does not apply. Therefore, depreciation expenses are allowable deductions while calculating the application of funds under Section 11 for this assessment year.

                          Key evidence and findings: The depreciation amount claimed by the assessee was Rs. 20,35,022/-. The Assessing Officer disallowed this depreciation while computing income applied to charitable purposes.

                          Application of law to facts: Applying the Supreme Court's ruling and the effective date of the amendment, the Tribunal found that depreciation must be allowed for the assessment year 2012-13.

                          Treatment of competing arguments: The Assessing Officer's disallowance was based on the amended Section 11(1) provisions, which the Tribunal found inapplicable retrospectively. Hence, the disallowance was not justified.

                          Conclusion: The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow depreciation while calculating the application of funds for the relevant assessment year.

                          3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

                          The Tribunal made the following crucial legal determinations:

                          "We note that in the provisions of section 11(1) it has been clearly mentioned '...15% of the income', hence it is gross income of the assessee trust and not the net income. Therefore, based on this factual position as mentioned in Section 11(1) as noted above, we direct the Assessing Officer to allow 15% exemption on gross receipts."

                          "Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajasthan Gujrati Charitable Foundation (2018) 402 ITR 441 (SC) held that amendment in section 11(1) brought by the Finance Act, 2014 w.e.f A.Y. 2015-16 which prohibited the allowance of depreciation is prospective in nature. That is amendment of the Finance Act, 2014, is applicable from A.Y. 2015-16. In assessee's case the assessment year is 2012-13, therefore amendment of Finance Act, 2014 does not apply to the assessee, hence, assessee is entitled for depreciation allowance."

                          Core principles established include:

                          - The 15% exemption under Section 11(1) is to be calculated on gross income derived from the property held under trust, not on net income.

                          - Amendments to tax provisions are prospective unless expressly stated otherwise; hence, depreciation disallowance introduced from A.Y. 2015-16 does not affect earlier years.

                          Final determinations:

                          - The exemption under Section 11(1) shall be computed on gross receipts.

                          - Depreciation expenses shall be allowed while calculating application of funds for the assessment year 2012-13.

                          Accordingly, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee and directed the Assessing Officer to recompute the income and exemption accordingly.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found