TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Contractor Fails to Perform, Faces Full Damages for Substantial Breach of Contractual Commitments Under Law</h1> <h3>Shubani Engineering & Consultants P. Ltd. Versus ITO, Ward 8 (3), New Delhi.</h3> Shubani Engineering & Consultants P. Ltd. Versus ITO, Ward 8 (3), New Delhi. - TMI In the case before the ITAT Delhi, the appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT (A), New Delhi was dismissed for non-prosecution. The Tribunal noted that a notice for the hearing scheduled on December 3, 2009, was sent to the assessee, but no appearance or request for adjournment was made by the assessee on the hearing date. Citing precedents, including CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee and Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, the Tribunal emphasized that merely filing an appeal is insufficient; it must be actively pursued. The Tribunal exercised its inherent powers under Rule 19 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963, to dismiss the appeal as unadmitted due to the assessee's absence. However, it was clarified that the order might be recalled if the assessee provides a satisfactory explanation for non-appearance. The dismissal was pronounced in open court on the same day.
TaxTMI 