Pre-deposit waiver in security agency valuation dispute was limited after no strong prima facie case was shown.

In a waiver of pre-deposit application concerning valuation of security agency services, the Tribunal found that reimbursement components could not be excluded from taxable value merely on the assessee's prima facie assertion, especially where earlier Tribunal decisions had already considered the valuation issue. It held that no strong prima facie case was made out for complete waiver, but it balanced the amount already deposited, including a deposit made by the official liquidator, against the plea of undue hardship. Partial waiver was therefore granted, with a further pre-deposit directed as a condition for hearing the appeal and the balance stayed until disposal.

---

---

Issues: Whether, in an application for waiver of pre-deposit, the assessee had made out a prima facie case and undue hardship warranting partial waiver in a dispute concerning valuation of security agency services.

Analysis: The dispute turned on whether reimbursement components in security services could be excluded from the taxable value and whether the assessee had a strong prima facie case on merits. The Tribunal noted that the issue of valuation in respect of security agency services had already been considered in earlier Tribunal decisions and, on that basis, held that the assessee did not establish a strong prima facie case. At the same time, the Tribunal took into account the amount already deposited and the fact that some amount had been deposited by the official liquidator, and balanced this against the plea of hardship while considering the requirement of pre-deposit for hearing the appeal.

Conclusion: The assessee was directed to make a further partial pre-deposit, and waiver was granted only for the balance amount till disposal of the appeal.

---