<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 219 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4608</link>
    <description>In a waiver of pre-deposit application concerning valuation of security agency services, the Tribunal found that reimbursement components could not be excluded from taxable value merely on the assessee&#039;s prima facie assertion, especially where earlier Tribunal decisions had already considered the valuation issue. It held that no strong prima facie case was made out for complete waiver, but it balanced the amount already deposited, including a deposit made by the official liquidator, against the plea of undue hardship. Partial waiver was therefore granted, with a further pre-deposit directed as a condition for hearing the appeal and the balance stayed until disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 219 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4608</link>
      <description>In a waiver of pre-deposit application concerning valuation of security agency services, the Tribunal found that reimbursement components could not be excluded from taxable value merely on the assessee&#039;s prima facie assertion, especially where earlier Tribunal decisions had already considered the valuation issue. It held that no strong prima facie case was made out for complete waiver, but it balanced the amount already deposited, including a deposit made by the official liquidator, against the plea of undue hardship. Partial waiver was therefore granted, with a further pre-deposit directed as a condition for hearing the appeal and the balance stayed until disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>