TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cancellation of the examination results could be sustained when the notices issued to the students were alleged to be vague and insufficient to enable an effective defence, and whether the inquiry was vitiated for breach of natural justice.
Analysis: The notices served on the students were found to be so vague and imprecise that they could not effectively defend themselves in the inquiry. On the peculiar facts and circumstances, the High Court's conclusion that the inquiry suffered from violation of natural justice was held to be justified.
Conclusion: The cancellation orders were not interfered with, and the challenge to the High Court's view failed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
