<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 387 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460755</link>
    <description>Examination result cancellation was challenged on the ground that the notices issued to students were vague and insufficient to permit an effective defence. The notices were found to be so imprecise that the inquiry was vitiated by breach of natural justice. On the peculiar facts, that conclusion was upheld, and the cancellation orders were not interfered with.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 13:01:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=798563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 387 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460755</link>
      <description>Examination result cancellation was challenged on the ground that the notices issued to students were vague and insufficient to permit an effective defence. The notices were found to be so imprecise that the inquiry was vitiated by breach of natural justice. On the peculiar facts, that conclusion was upheld, and the cancellation orders were not interfered with.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>