TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Allahabad HC Orders Respondent No. 2 to Address Petitioner's Objection in Eight Weeks with a Hearing Opportunity.</h1> <h3>Rajendra Kumar Sharma Versus The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax And 2 Others</h3> The Allahabad HC directed respondent No. 2 to address the petitioner's objection within eight weeks, ensuring a hearing opportunity for the petitioner. ... Inaction on the part of the respondent authorities in deciding objection filed in pursuance of the order passed by the Supreme Court - HELD THAT:- Upon hearing counsel on behalf of the parties, we are of the view that this writ petition should be disposed of with a direction given upon respondent No.2 to dispose of the objection dated November 12, 2023 filed by the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from date after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. In the case before the Allahabad High Court, presided over by Hon'ble Justices Shekhar B. Saraf and Manjive Shukla, the petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner was aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent authorities regarding his objection dated November 12, 2023, which was filed in compliance with a Supreme Court order. After hearing both parties, the court directed respondent No. 2 to address the petitioner's objection within eight weeks, ensuring the petitioner is granted an opportunity for a hearing. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
