Discharge at framing stage requires only prima facie suspicion; defence claims must wait for trial where materials support allegations.

At the discharge stage under Section 239 CrPC, the court is concerned only with whether the charge sheet and supporting material disclose a prima facie case and strong suspicion against the accused; it should not weigh the defence in detail or conduct a roving enquiry. On the materials described, allegations that the accused was a director, signed relevant documents, and participated in obtaining an overdraft on the basis of allegedly inflated and fabricated financial statements were treated as sufficient to require trial. The claim that she was only a name-lender was stated to be a matter for trial, not a ground for discharge.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to discharge under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the ground that the materials did not disclose her active involvement in the alleged conspiracy and cheating offences.

Analysis: At the stage of considering discharge, the Court is required to see only whether the charge sheet and accompanying materials disclose a prima facie case and whether there is strong suspicion warranting trial; a detailed appraisal of the defence version is impermissible. The charge sheet, witness statements and company records showed specific allegations that the petitioner was one of the directors of the company, had signed relevant documents, and had participated in obtaining the overdraft facility on the basis of allegedly inflated and fabricated financial statements. The contention that she was merely a name-lender and that no criminal liability could arise was held to be a matter for trial and not a ground for discharge.

Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to discharge and the revision was dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the police report and supporting materials disclose specific allegations and prima facie evidence against an accused, the Court should not conduct a roving enquiry into the defence at the discharge stage and may proceed with the trial if strong suspicion exists.

---