Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amended Stock Exchange bye-laws introducing limitation applied retrospectively to transactions and causes of action that had arisen before the amendment, so as to bar the petitioner's reference.
Analysis: The amended bye-laws came into force on 29 August 1998 and contained no express indication of retrospective operation. The dispute arose from transactions completed well before that date, and the last account entry was also much earlier. Delegated legislation does not operate retrospectively unless such power is clearly conferred or necessarily implied. The limitation provision introduced by the amendment could govern references and transactions entered into after the amendment, but not earlier transactions already completed or causes of action already accrued. The contrary view would improperly unsettle vested rights and create uncertainty in pending or past disputes.
Conclusion: The amended bye-laws did not apply retrospectively to the petitioner's pre-amendment transactions, and the arbitral tribunal erred in treating the claim as time-barred under the amended provision.
Ratio Decidendi: Subordinate legislative bye-laws cannot be given retrospective effect to defeat rights arising from transactions or causes of action that predate the amendment, unless retrospective operation is expressly authorised or clearly intended.