Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Bail Denied: Court Finds Adequate Medical Care Provided for Applicant with Severe Health Issues in Custody.</h1> <h3>Rajkishor Gunnidhi Dash @ Raju Pandit Versus The State of Maharashtra</h3> The court denied the bail application on medical grounds, despite the applicant's severe health issues, including HIV and tuberculosis. The court ... Seeking bail on medical grounds - medical emergency is there or not - HELD THAT:- The applicant has been prosecuted for the offence under the provisions MCOC Act. The previous application was preferred on the ground that the applicant was tested positive for Covid-19. Report was called from Jail. The said application was rejected on 12th June, 2020 on the ground that subsequently the report of test was negative and medical emergency not in existence. On the previous date of hearing the question relating to the maintainability of the application was kept open. It is not necessary to dwell upon the said issue in the light of report submitted by the Chief Medical Officer, it is not inclined to grant bail on medical ground. Medical report is taken on record. The report indicate that the applicant is under close observation of prison Medical Officers in consultation with J.J. Hospital Doctors. He was regularly referred to J. J. Hospital for follow up and his overall health is moderately stable at present. Hence, no ground is made to grant relief in this application. Application rejected. Issues:Bail on medical ground due to severe health conditions, including HIV and tuberculosis, of the applicant while in custody.Analysis:The applicant filed a bail application citing various health issues, including being diagnosed with HIV and tuberculosis, and his deteriorating immune system due to the medical conditions. The applicant's counsel argued that the applicant's health condition warranted bail, referring to a Supreme Court decision highlighting the impact of HIV on an individual's health. The applicant's immune system was described as extremely weak, making him vulnerable to contracting other infections, especially under pandemic circumstances. The applicant's CD-4 cell count, crucial in HIV cases, was noted to be at 550 per cubic millimeter, posing a risk of developing AIDS if it falls below 500. The applicant was reported to be in constant pain due to tumours and swelling in his lymph nodes.The Special Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application, stating that the applicant was the head of a crime syndicate and received proper treatment in jail. A medical report from the Chief Medical Officer of Mumbai Central Prison was submitted, indicating the applicant's medical condition and the treatment provided. The report detailed the applicant's health issues, including HIV, extra-pulmonary tuberculosis, chronic cystitis, and herpes genitalia, with regular follow-ups at J.J. Hospital. The report mentioned that the applicant was under close observation by prison medical officers and J.J. Hospital doctors, and his overall health was moderately stable.Considering the medical report and the applicant's treatment and monitoring by medical professionals, the court rejected the bail application on medical grounds. The court found that the applicant's health was being adequately managed and monitored, with regular follow-ups and consultations with specialists. The court concluded that there was no sufficient ground to grant bail based on the applicant's medical condition. The interim application for bail was thus rejected and disposed of accordingly.The judgment emphasized the importance of medical reports and professional medical care in evaluating bail applications based on medical grounds. It highlighted the need for thorough assessment and monitoring of an applicant's health condition by medical experts when considering bail due to medical reasons. The court's decision was based on the detailed medical report provided, indicating the applicant's ongoing treatment and stable health condition under medical supervision.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found