Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal had power under section 254(2) to condone a delay of 1279 days in filing the miscellaneous application and recall the earlier appellate order.
Analysis: The miscellaneous application was filed long after receipt of the original order. The Tribunal held that section 254(2) does not confer any power to condone delay in filing a miscellaneous application. Authorities cited on behalf of the assessee were found inapplicable because they related to main appellate proceedings and not to miscellaneous application proceedings under section 254(2).
Conclusion: The delay in filing the miscellaneous application was not condonable and the request for recall was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The miscellaneous application was dismissed for want of any statutory basis to condone the delay.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of an express statutory provision, delay in filing a miscellaneous application under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 cannot be condoned by the Tribunal.