<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1460 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457461</link>
    <description>Section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act does not confer any express power on the Tribunal to condone delay in filing a miscellaneous application. The Tribunal therefore treated a 1,279-day delay as not legally condonable, distinguished authorities cited by the assessee as relating to main appellate proceedings, and rejected the request to recall the earlier appellate order. The miscellaneous application was dismissed for want of a statutory basis to extend limitation for such proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=769263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1460 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457461</link>
      <description>Section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act does not confer any express power on the Tribunal to condone delay in filing a miscellaneous application. The Tribunal therefore treated a 1,279-day delay as not legally condonable, distinguished authorities cited by the assessee as relating to main appellate proceedings, and rejected the request to recall the earlier appellate order. The miscellaneous application was dismissed for want of a statutory basis to extend limitation for such proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=457461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>