ITAT Partly Allows Appeals, Sets 5% Profit Estimation on Disputed Purchases for Fair Outcome.

The ITAT partly allowed the appeals for A.Y. 2009-10 and A.Y. 2010-11, addressing the challenge to profit estimation from ingenuine purchases. The Tribunal, considering historical precedents and the nature of transactions, determined a 5% profit estimation on disputed purchases, ensuring a fair outcome for the assessee.

---

---

Issues:
Challenging the validity of reopening of assessment for the A.Y. 2009-10.
Challenging the profit estimation made on account of ingenuine purchases.

Analysis:
The appeal in ITA No. 2556/Mum/2022 for A.Y. 2009-10 arose from the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre, New Delhi against the order of assessment under Section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The ground challenging the validity of reopening the assessment for A.Y. 2009-10 was not pressed by the authorized representative during the hearing and was dismissed. The main issue in both appeals was the challenge to the profit estimation due to ingenuine purchases.

The assessee, engaged in trading ferrous and non-ferrous metals, had made purchases from tainted parties as per the Sales Tax Department of the Government of Maharashtra. Despite providing relevant documents like purchase invoices, bank statements, stock registers, and supplier details, the assessee failed to prove the delivery of goods from these suppliers. The Assessing Officer conducted independent inquiries which were inconclusive. As the sales made by the assessee were not disputed, the Assessing Officer decided to tax only the profit element from the disputed purchases, estimating it at 15% for A.Y. 2009-10 and 12.5% for A.Y. 2010-11. The CIT (A) directed the profit percentage to be estimated at 12.5% for both years.

Given that the sales from the disputed purchases were not in question, it was inferred that the assessee engaged in grey market purchases to save on indirect taxes and earn profits. The Tribunal historically estimated profit percentages for similar cases at 5%, which the authorized representative agreed to. Consequently, the profit element was calculated at 5% of the disputed purchases to ensure justice. As a result, the grounds raised for A.Y. 2009-10 and A.Y. 2010-11 were partly allowed, and both appeals were partly allowed.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's decision on the profit estimation of ingenuine purchases was based on the nature of the transactions and historical precedents, ensuring a fair and just outcome for the assessee.

---