Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the suit was not maintainable for want of registration of the public trust, and whether the finding on that issue could be interfered with on the ground that the appellant had not been heard.
Analysis: The objection that the issue had been decided without notice was not accepted for want of supporting material on record. On merits, the public trust was required to be registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act as applicable after 1982, irrespective of income or valuation of assets. The lower appellate court had recorded a finding that the suit was not maintainable for want of registration, and no error in that finding was shown.
Conclusion: The challenge to the finding on maintainability failed, and the appeal was liable to be dismissed.