Tribunal Rules: Use LIBOR for Non-Resident Interest; Tax Deduction Issue Remitted for Further Examination.

The Tribunal dismissed certain grounds not pursued by the appellant. It ruled that interest on delayed consideration from non-residents should be calculated using the LIBOR rate, not the Prime Lending Rate, due to the foreign origin of funds. Regarding the disallowance of reimbursed amounts for nondeduction of tax, the Tribunal remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer, pending the AAR's decision, in accordance with Section 245RR of the Income Tax Act. The appeal was partially allowed, requiring further examination post-AAR decision.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Dismissal of certain grounds raised by the appellant before the Tribunal.
2. Dispute regarding the levy of interest on delayed receipt of consideration from non-residents.
3. Disallowance of amount reimbursed to M/s. GTE Overseas Corporation for nondeduction of tax.

Issue 1: Dismissal of Grounds Raised by the Appellant
The appellant's representative did not press Ground Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 before the Tribunal, leading to their dismissal. The grounds were not pursued by the appellant's representative, resulting in their rejection by the Tribunal.

Issue 2: Levy of Interest on Delayed Receipt of Consideration
The Assessing Officer estimated notional interest on delayed consideration from non-residents, applying the Prime Lending Rate (PLR) under the amended transfer pricing scheme. The appellant's representative argued that interest should be based on the LIBOR rate, not PLR. The Departmental Representative contended that Indian interest rates should apply since the source of funds was from India. The Tribunal held that interest was due to a change in transfer pricing policy for delayed purchase money, originating from a foreign country. Following established legal principles, interest should be charged based on the LIBOR rate, not PLR. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside previous orders, directing the Assessing Officer to apply interest under the LIBOR rate.

Issue 3: Disallowance of Reimbursed Amount for Nondeduction of Tax
The appellant sought Advance Rulings on whether reimbursed expenditure to M/s. GTE Overseas Corporation required Tax Deducted at Source (TDS). Initially, the AAR classified the reimbursement as royalty, necessitating TDS. The matter was referred back to the AAR by the Madras High Court, and it is currently pending there. The appellant requested to keep the issue pending until the AAR's decision, citing Section 245RR of the Income Tax Act, which mandates such action when a matter is before the AAR. The Tribunal concurred and remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation after the AAR's decision, aligning with the legal provisions. Therefore, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting the stage for further examination post the AAR's decision.

This detailed analysis of the judgment addresses the dismissal of certain grounds, the dispute over interest levy, and the disallowance of reimbursed amounts for tax deduction, providing a comprehensive understanding of each issue's legal implications and the Tribunal's decision.

---