Transfer pricing adjustments upheld on forex gains treatment and comparable entity selection criteria under section 40(a)(i)

The ITAT Chennai ruled on transfer pricing adjustments involving forex gains/losses treatment and comparable entity selection. The tribunal held that forex gains must be treated as operating income, consistent with forex losses being treated as operating costs, rejecting TPO's differential treatment. For comparable entities, the tribunal excluded Infosys BPO Ltd due to diversified services and brand value differences, excluded BNR Udyog Ltd as medical transcription services aren't comparable to routine software services, but included Informed Technologies India Ltd as functionally similar. Several matters were remitted to AO/TPO for fresh consideration with specific directions. The disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was restored to AO for consistent treatment.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Enhancement of returned income.
2. Disallowance of payments to GTE-Overseas.
3. Disallowance of provision for lease equalization reserve.
4. Treatment of foreign exchange (forex) gain.
5. Inclusion/exclusion of comparable companies for IT and ITeS segments.
6. Economic adjustments in computing Arm's Length Price (ALP).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Enhancement of Returned Income:
The assessee contested that the lower authorities erred in enhancing the returned income, arguing that the assessment order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and applicable law. The tribunal did not find specific arguments supporting this general ground and thus did not address it in detail.

2. Disallowance of Payments to GTE-Overseas:
The lower authorities disallowed payments made to GTE-Overseas, holding them liable to withholding tax under section 195 of the Act. The assessee argued that these payments were mere reimbursements and not chargeable to tax. The tribunal noted that this issue was pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and restored the matter to the AO for re-adjudication after awaiting the final decision from the Supreme Court.

3. Disallowance of Provision for Lease Equalization Reserve:
The assessee did not press this ground before the tribunal, and thus, it was not addressed in the judgment.

4. Treatment of Forex Gain:
The assessee argued that forex gains should be treated as operating items since forex losses were treated as operating losses. The tribunal agreed, stating that forex gains and losses form part of routine business operations and should be given the same treatment. The tribunal directed that forex gains be treated as part of operating income.

5. Inclusion/Exclusion of Comparable Companies for IT and ITeS Segments:

IT Segment:
- M/s Thirdware Solutions Ltd.: The assessee sought exclusion based on functional differences, arguing it was a product company. The tribunal remitted the issue back to the AO/TPO for re-adjudication, allowing the assessee to substantiate its claims.
- M/s Akshay Software Technologies Ltd.: The tribunal found the TPO's exclusion erroneous and directed the TPO to include this entity as a comparable, noting it met the applied filters and was accepted in similar cases by other tribunals.

ITeS Segment:
- M/s Infosys BPO Ltd.: The tribunal directed exclusion of this entity, noting its diversified activities, high turnover, and significant brand value, making it functionally dissimilar to the assessee.
- M/s BNR Udyog Ltd.: The tribunal directed exclusion, agreeing with the assessee that it was engaged in KPO services, which are not comparable to routine software services provided by the assessee.
- M/s Informed Technologies India Ltd.: The tribunal directed inclusion, noting it operates as an IT-enabled service provider and was accepted as a comparable in similar cases.
- M/s Ace BPO Services Ltd.: The tribunal directed the AO/TPO to consider inclusion after reviewing the financial statements, as the current year data was available.

6. Economic Adjustments in Computing ALP:
The tribunal did not find specific arguments supporting this general ground and thus did not address it in detail.

Conclusion:
The appeal was partly allowed, with specific directions for re-adjudication on certain issues and acceptance of the assessee's arguments on others. The tribunal emphasized the need for consistent treatment of forex gains and losses and directed the AO/TPO to re-evaluate the inclusion/exclusion of certain comparable entities. The issue of payments to GTE-Overseas was restored to the AO for re-adjudication pending the Supreme Court's decision. The order was pronounced on 29th November, 2023.

---