Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order of the appellate court directing deposit of 20% of the compensation amount while considering suspension of sentence in a cheque dishonour appeal was liable to be quashed for want of separate reasons.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 permits the appellate court to direct deposit of the prescribed amount while dealing with an appeal against conviction under Section 138. Such a condition is ordinarily justified and is intended to secure the decretal liability during the pendency of appeal. The requirement becomes vulnerable only where the appellant makes out an exceptional case showing that the condition would be unjust or would effectively deprive the right of appeal, and in such a case reasons are expected. On the facts pleaded, no such exceptional circumstance was shown, and the absence of further reasons in the impugned order did not vitiate the direction.
Conclusion: The challenge to the deposit condition failed, and the petition for quashing was rightly rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appellate court's direction to deposit 20% of the compensation amount was upheld, and the interference sought under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was declined.
Ratio Decidendi: A deposit condition under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is ordinarily permissible in an appeal against conviction under Section 138, and it can be dispensed with only on a shown exceptional case with recorded reasons.