Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether excise duty or loss of revenue could be levied on wastage of rectified spirit, being industrial alcohol not fit for human consumption, while it remained in storage and had not been cleared for potable use.
Analysis: The levy turned on the constitutional division of legislative power between industrial alcohol and alcoholic liquor for human consumption. Rectified spirit not fit for human consumption remained within the Central domain until it was cleared or removed for conversion into potable liquor. Since the loss occurred while the spirit was still in storage and no conversion or removal for potable purposes had taken place, the State could not treat the wastage as excisable liquor for human consumption or assess duty on a notional basis of possible potable output. The claim for revenue loss under the excise manual could not be applied to such stored rectified spirit.
Conclusion: No excise duty or revenue loss could be levied on the wastage of rectified spirit during storage, and the impugned demand was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The challenge succeeded because the State had no authority to levy duty on wastage of rectified spirit not yet brought into the category of alcoholic liquor for human consumption.
Ratio Decidendi: Rectified spirit not fit for human consumption is not liable to State excise duty while it remains in storage, and duty cannot be imposed on its wastage on the basis of a notional conversion into potable liquor.