Treaty taxation of refund interest turns on real nexus with a permanent establishment; absent effective connection, Article 12 applies

Interest on income-tax refund received by a non-resident was not effectively connected with its India permanent establishment because the branch had no business activity during the relevant year and the refund claim lacked a real nexus with that establishment under the treaty's asset-test or activity-test. The receipt therefore fell within Article 12 of the India-France DTAA as interest, and Article 7 business profits treatment could not be invoked; it was taxable only at the treaty rate under Article 12(2).

---

---

Issues: Whether interest on income-tax refund received by a non-resident assessee was taxable as business income under Article 7 of the India-France DTAA on the footing that it was effectively connected with its permanent establishment in India, or was taxable as interest under Article 12 of the DTAA at the treaty rate.

Analysis: The India branch office had no business activity during the relevant year. The decisive question was not merely whether the assessee had a permanent establishment, but whether the debt-claim giving rise to the interest on refund was effectively connected with that permanent establishment so as to attract the exception in Article 12(5). The established treaty test requires a real effective nexus with the permanent establishment, assessed on the basis of the asset-test or activity-test. Interest on income-tax refund was held not to satisfy that test, particularly when the branch had no business operations during the year. The treaty therefore kept the receipt within Article 12(2), and the business-profits article could not be invoked.

Conclusion: The interest on income-tax refund was not effectively connected with the permanent establishment and was taxable only as interest under Article 12 of the India-France DTAA at the treaty rate, not as business income under Article 7.

---