Statutory levy collections excluded from presumptive receipts; refund interest taxed at treaty rate absent PE connection.

Statutory levies collected on behalf of the Government do not form part of gross receipts for presumptive taxation under section 44BB, so service tax and VAT were excluded from the computation. Interest on income-tax refund was taxable at the more beneficial treaty rate under Article 11 of the Indo-US DTAA because it was not treated as business income and was not shown to be effectively connected with a permanent establishment. The assessee therefore succeeded on both substantive issues, and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether service tax and VAT collected by the assessee were includible in gross receipts for computation of presumptive income under section 44BB. (ii) Whether interest received on income-tax refund was taxable at the treaty rate under Article 11 of the Indo-US DTAA or as business income at the domestic rate.

Issue (i): Whether service tax and VAT collected by the assessee were includible in gross receipts for computation of presumptive income under section 44BB.

Analysis: The statutory scheme of section 44BB applies to amounts paid or payable for services and related activities, while service tax is a tax collected for onward payment to the Government and does not form part of consideration for the services themselves. The existing judicial position accepted that such statutory collections are outside the gross receipts for presumptive computation.

Conclusion: Service tax and VAT were not includible in gross receipts for section 44BB computation, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether interest received on income-tax refund was taxable at the treaty rate under Article 11 of the Indo-US DTAA or as business income at the domestic rate.

Analysis: Under section 90(2), the assessee was entitled to the more beneficial treaty provision. Article 11 permits source-State taxation of interest but caps the tax rate where the beneficiary is a resident of the other Contracting State. The interest on refund was not treated as business income arising from the permanent establishment, and it was not found to be effectively connected with the permanent establishment on either an asset-test or activity-test basis.

Conclusion: The refund interest was taxable under Article 11 of the Indo-US DTAA at the treaty rate, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on both substantive issues, resulting in rejection of the Revenue's challenge and acceptance of the assessee's cross-objection.

Ratio Decidendi: Amounts collected as statutory levies and passed on to the Government do not form part of gross receipts for presumptive taxation, and treaty-rate taxation applies to interest income not effectively connected with the permanent establishment when the treaty is more beneficial.

---