Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest on income-tax refund under section 244A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was taxable as business income under Article 7 of the India-Malaysia DTAA or as interest income under Article 11(2) of the DTAA.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the refund interest was effectively connected with the assessee's permanent establishment in India. The Tribunal followed the Special Bench view that interest on income-tax refund is not effectively connected with the permanent establishment either on the asset test or the activity test. It also relied on the jurisdictional High Court decision which accepted that such refund interest is to be taxed with reference to the relevant interest article of the treaty and not as business profits attributable to the permanent establishment.
Conclusion: Interest on income-tax refund was held taxable under Article 11(2) of the India-Malaysia DTAA and not under Article 7. The corresponding grounds were allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest on income-tax refund is not, by itself, effectively connected with the permanent establishment and is taxable under the treaty provision governing interest income.