Reassessment quashed for failing to provide personal hearing under s.148A(b); statute requires opportunity to be heard

Kerala HC held reassessment proceedings invalid for failing to afford the assessee the opportunity of being heard required under s.148A(b), ruling that the statutory opportunity must ordinarily include a personal hearing to permit the assessee to address issues raised in the show cause notice. The court rejected reliance on earlier precedents construing different statutory regimes and noted legislative amendments simplifying the hearing requirement reinforce a right to personal hearing. Decision rendered against the Revenue; reassessment quashed for breach of the hearing mandate.

---

---

Issues:
The appeal involves the challenge to an order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act and the consequential notice proposing a re-assessment for the assessment year 2019-20. The main issue is whether the order and notice were vitiated due to the lack of providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee as mandated under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act.

Judgment Details:
In the writ petition, the challenge was to Ext. P5 order passed by the Income Tax Officer without affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard as required by law. The learned Single Judge quashed the order and notice, directing the petitioner to appear for a hearing. The Revenue contended that issuing a show cause notice under Section 148A was sufficient to provide an opportunity of being heard, relying on previous court decisions.

The court analyzed Section 148A of the IT Act, emphasizing that the obligation to provide an opportunity of being heard goes beyond merely issuing a show cause notice. The purpose of the notice is to specify the matters for discussion, but a personal hearing is essential for the assessee to present their case effectively. The court highlighted the importance of oral hearings in complementing written submissions, quoting relevant legal opinions.

The court rejected the Revenue's argument that a show cause notice alone fulfills the obligation of providing an opportunity of being heard. It emphasized that a personal hearing allows the assessee to persuade the Income Tax Officer and clarify their position effectively. The court's interpretation was supported by an amendment to Section 148A(b) showing a simplification of the procedure for granting an opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

In conclusion, the court dismissed the Writ Appeal, finding no merit in the Revenue's contentions. The judgment reaffirmed the necessity of a personal hearing as part of the opportunity of being heard granted to the assessee under Section 148A of the IT Act.

---