Customs broker license renewal denied for operating without authorized signatory and filing false police complaint

CESTAT Chennai dismissed the appeal challenging refusal of customs broker license renewal. The appellant-firm operated without customs authorized signatory from 2012-2015, clearing consignments despite knowing the license was inoperable. The firm filed false police complaint claiming original license was lost while another party possessed it, and submitted duplicate license request to Revenue authorities on same grounds. Commissioner properly exercised authority under CBLR 2013 Regulation 9 to refuse renewal due to misconduct including forgery allegations and unauthorized operations. Appeal lacked merit as appellant failed to provide plausible explanation for serious violations.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Replacement of Authorized Person.
2. Issuance of Duplicate CHA License.
3. Renewal of Customs Broker's License.
4. Allegations of Suppression and Misconduct.

Summary:

Replacement of Authorized Person:
The appellant requested to replace Mr. R. Mahadevan with Mr. Bose Thomas as their authorized person to transact Custom House work, which was accepted by the Deputy Commissioner (Customs), Coimbatore on 12.04.2011. However, due to internal disputes, Mr. R. Mahadevan filed a civil suit, and the appellant later sought to replace Mr. Bose Thomas with Mr. K. Sriram, which was not accepted by the Department due to discrepancies and lack of clarification.

Issuance of Duplicate CHA License:
The appellant sought issuance of a duplicate CHA License on 27.05.2011, claiming the original was not traceable. However, it was later revealed that Mr. R. Mahadevan retained the original license, and the appellant had allegedly suppressed this fact and filed a false police complaint for the loss of the original license.

Renewal of Customs Broker's License:
The appellant's application for renewal dated 14.12.2015 was returned due to discrepancies, including the non-clarification of the status of Mr. Bose Thomas. The Hon'ble High Court of Madras directed the appellant to submit clarifications, which led to further communications and ultimately the non-renewal of the license by the Commissioner due to the appellant's misconduct and discrepancies in the application.

Allegations of Suppression and Misconduct:
The Commissioner highlighted the appellant's misconduct, including the suppression of facts regarding the original license, forgery allegations, and operating the license without a Customs authorized signatory from 2012 onwards. The appellant failed to provide reasonable explanations for these serious allegations.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal found no irregularity or illegality in the Commissioner's decision and dismissed the appeal on grounds of serious misconduct and discrepancies by the appellant, which justified the non-renewal of the Customs Broker's License. The appeal was dismissed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 24.01.2024.

---