Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revisionary order under section 263 was sustainable when the Assessing Officer had enquired into the assessee's claim of treaty exemption on long-term capital gains arising from sale of shares acquired before 1 April 2017.
Analysis: The assessment record showed that the Assessing Officer had issued detailed queries on the capital-gain computation, the treaty claim, the tax residency certificate, the acquisition and sale of shares, the share purchase agreement, the buyer's details, and the valuation report. The assessee replied with the relevant incorporation documents, tax residency certificate, shareholding and transaction particulars, and explained that the shares had been acquired in 2007-08, well before the protocol amendments to Article 13 of the India-Mauritius tax treaty took effect. The treaty amendment and CBDT's contemporaneous clarification grandfathered investments made before 1 April 2017. On these facts, the assessment order reflected a permissible view taken after enquiry, and the revisionary authority did not identify any specific enquiry that was demonstrably absent.
Conclusion: The revision under section 263 was not justified and was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Assessing Officer has conducted enquiry on the relevant treaty claim and adopts a legally sustainable view on grandfathered treaty protection for pre-1 April 2017 share acquisitions, the assessment order cannot be revised merely because the revisional authority considers further enquiry desirable.