<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 654 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448255</link>
    <description>The Assessing Officer made detailed enquiries into the assessee&#039;s treaty exemption claim on long-term capital gains from shares acquired before 1 April 2017, including the tax residency certificate, share purchase documents, valuation report, and transaction particulars, and accepted the claim on the basis of grandfathered protection under the India-Mauritius tax treaty and CBDT clarification. As the assessment order was passed after enquiry and reflected a plausible legal view, the revisionary authority could not invoke section 263 merely because further enquiry was considered desirable. The revisionary order was therefore unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:06:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=740072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 654 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448255</link>
      <description>The Assessing Officer made detailed enquiries into the assessee&#039;s treaty exemption claim on long-term capital gains from shares acquired before 1 April 2017, including the tax residency certificate, share purchase documents, valuation report, and transaction particulars, and accepted the claim on the basis of grandfathered protection under the India-Mauritius tax treaty and CBDT clarification. As the assessment order was passed after enquiry and reflected a plausible legal view, the revisionary authority could not invoke section 263 merely because further enquiry was considered desirable. The revisionary order was therefore unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=448255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>