Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the receipts from loyalty programme, reservation, marketing and blackberry services were taxable as royalty or fees for technical services under the Act and the India-Singapore DTAA, or constituted business income.
Analysis: The services were provided under agreements distinct from the franchise/licence arrangement for use of the brand name and trade mark. The receipts in dispute were found to relate to centralized marketing, loyalty, reservation and related support functions rendered from outside India, without transfer of any right to use intellectual property, equipment, process, or technical knowledge. On the treaty language, the services did not qualify as royalty under Article 12(3), and Article 12(4)(a) was inapplicable because the services were not ancillary and subsidiary to the enjoyment of the royalty-bearing right. Article 12(4)(b) also failed because no technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or process was made available.
Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable as royalty or fees for technical services and were to be treated as business income.
Ratio Decidendi: Where centralized hotel-related services are rendered under a separate agreement and do not facilitate or transmit a right, property, process or technical know-how, the consideration is not royalty or fees for included services under the relevant treaty provisions.