Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts from loyalty programme, reservation fee and marketing fee were taxable as royalty under the Act and Article 12 of the India-Singapore Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Analysis: The addition was made by following the position taken in an earlier year. The Tribunal noted that, on identical facts in the assessee's own case for a prior assessment year, the co-ordinate Bench had held that the disputed receipts could not be characterised as royalty and had directed deletion of the addition. Following that binding factual and legal pattern, the Tribunal accepted the assessee's claim and deleted the entire addition. The related interest grounds were only consequential to the main addition, and the penalty ground became academic after deletion of the addition.
Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable as royalty, and the addition was deleted in favour of the assessee. The consequential interest issue was to be recomputed in accordance with law, while the penalty issue was not adjudicated as academic.