Assessment Order for 2015-16 Overturned Due to Lack of Authority and Time Limit Breach; New Hearing Ordered. The HC set aside the Assessment Order for the Assessment Year 2015-2016, finding it was passed without authority and barred by limitation. The court ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Assessment Order for 2015-16 Overturned Due to Lack of Authority and Time Limit Breach; New Hearing Ordered.
The HC set aside the Assessment Order for the Assessment Year 2015-2016, finding it was passed without authority and barred by limitation. The court deemed the notice under Section 148 as issued under Section 148A, per the Finance Act, 2021. The Assessment Officer was directed to provide necessary documents within 30 days, allowing the petitioner to reply within two weeks. A new assessment/reassessment order is to be passed after considering the reply and providing a personal hearing. The Writ Petition was allowed, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.
Issues: The issue involves challenging a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the consequential Assessment Order for the Assessment year 2015-2016.
Details of the Judgment: The petitioner argued that the notice was served beyond the time limit as it was sent through e-mail without digital or manual signatures on 01.04.2021, even though it was dated 31.03.2021. The Assessment Order was passed on 23.03.2022 without considering these grounds raised by the petitioner.
The respondents contended that the notice was issued within the period of limitation, uploaded on 31.03.2021, and sent by e-mail and registered post on 01.04.2021. They provided proof of affidavit to support their claim that there was no error in issuing the notice.
It was further argued that a physical copy of the notice, manually signed and issued as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act, was dispatched on 31.03.2021 and served on the petitioner on 05.04.2021, duly acknowledged by the petitioner. An additional copy was also sent electronically via e-mail on 01.04.2021.
Regarding the new procedure for reopening assessments under the Finance Act, 2021, it was stated that the reopening proceedings in this case were initiated before 01.04.2021 under the old provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, hence not falling under the new procedure.
The Court observed that the notice under Section 147 was issued on 31.03.2021 but claimed to be issued on 01.04.2021 by post and e-mail without digital signature. The Assessment Order was passed on 23.03.2022 without considering these facts.
The Court held that the Assessment Order was passed without authority and was barred by limitation. To avoid issuing fresh notices, the Court deemed the impugned notice to have been issued under Section 148A of the Act as amended by the Finance Act, 2021, citing a relevant Supreme Court case.
The Court set aside the Assessment Order and directed the Assessment Officer to provide necessary documents to the petitioner within 30 days of the request. The petitioner could then file a reply within two weeks, and fresh assessment/reassessment orders were to be passed after considering the reply and affording a personal hearing.
The Writ Petition was allowed without costs, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.