Regular bail in money-laundering probe allowed where arrest and custody were found arbitrary and no new incriminating material emerged.

In a money-laundering investigation, the HC held that regular bail could be granted where the agency already possessed the incriminating material, no materially new facts emerged from the accused's examination, and the arrest and custodial handling appeared arbitrary and oppressive. The Court noted that the alleged fund movements were old, the core material was already known through earlier statements, and continued detention could not be used punitively at the investigation stage. Recognising the seriousness of economic offences, the Court nevertheless found that any flight-risk concern could be met by bail conditions and accordingly granted regular bail.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioners, accused in a money-laundering investigation, were entitled to regular bail on the ground that the arrest and custodial interrogation were arbitrary and that the materials relied upon did not justify continued detention.

Analysis: The allegations arose from alleged laundering of IPO proceeds and circular movement of funds through entities said to be connected with the accused. The Court noted that the transactions were old, the material against the petitioners was substantially already within the knowledge of the investigating agency through statements earlier recorded from a co-accused, and no materially new incriminating fact was shown to have emerged from the petitioners' examination. The Court also considered the manner in which the petitioners were kept in the control of the investigating officers and recorded the view that the process adopted was oppressive and not in keeping with fair standards expected of an investigative agency. While recognising the seriousness of economic offences and the statutory constraints under the bail regime, the Court held that detention at the stage of investigation cannot become punitive and that the apprehension of flight risk could be addressed by conditions.

Conclusion: The petitioners were found entitled to regular bail.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the investigating agency already possesses the incriminating material, no new material emerges from the accused's examination, and the manner of arrest and custody appears arbitrary, regular bail may be granted in an economic offence subject to suitable conditions.

---