Stringent twin conditions for PMLA bail not met as prima facie material indicated involvement in laundering activity.

In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was considered subject to the stringent twin conditions in Section 45: the accused must show reasonable grounds for believing he is not guilty and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. On the material before the Court, including investigative statements and documentary records, a prima facie case of involvement in laundering activity was found, and the explanation that cash deposits reflected lawful business receipts was rejected. The plea based on prolonged incarceration was also not accepted, and bail was declined for failure to satisfy the statutory rigour.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and whether the statutory conditions under Section 45 of that Act stood satisfied.

Analysis: The application was considered in the context of the stringent bail regime under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, which requires the Court to be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. On the material placed before it, including the statements recorded during investigation and the surrounding documentary material, the Court found a prima facie case indicating the applicant's involvement in the alleged laundering activity. The Court rejected the plea that the cash deposits were fully explained by lawful business receipts, and also noted that the material regarding the alleged invoices was disputed. The argument based on prolonged incarceration was considered, but the Court held that the facts of the case did not justify release on bail in view of the statutory rigour.

Conclusion: The applicant failed to satisfy the twin conditions under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and bail was declined.

Final Conclusion: The bail request was refused, leaving the prosecution to proceed in accordance with law and without any expression on the merits of the trial.

Ratio Decidendi: In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, bail cannot be granted unless the accused satisfies the statutory twin conditions by showing reasonable grounds of non-guilt and no likelihood of reoffending while on bail.

---