Bail discretion must be humane and liberty-oriented, with custody justified only by real risks of abscondence or interference.

Bail discretion must be exercised in a liberty-oriented and humane manner, with the presumption of innocence favouring release unless custody is justified by concrete risk factors. The Court reiterated that relevant considerations include whether the accused was arrested during investigation, cooperation with the investigating agency, risk of abscondence or interference with the trial, and antecedents. Poverty and indigent status are also relevant, and bail conditions must not be so onerous as to make release illusory. Applying these principles, the appellant showed no material risk of absconding or tampering with evidence, so bail ought to have been granted on reasonable conditions.

---

---

Issues: Whether bail ought to be granted to the appellant in the circumstances of the case, and whether the discretion to deny bail had been properly exercised.

Analysis: The governing principles reaffirmed that an accused is entitled to the presumption of innocence and that bail is ordinarily the rule while incarceration is an exception. The relevant considerations included whether the accused was arrested during investigation, whether he cooperated with the investigating agency, whether there was any material suggesting abscondence or interference with the trial, and whether the accused had a prior criminal background. The Court also stressed that poverty and indigent status are relevant factors, that a humane and compassionate approach is required, and that bail conditions should not be so onerous as to make release illusory. On the facts, the appellant had not been arrested during investigation, had not been shown to pose a risk of absconding or tampering with evidence, and there was nothing on record to suggest past misconduct warranting continued custody.

Conclusion: Bail ought to have been granted to the appellant, and the refusal by the courts below was not justified. The appellant was entitled to release on reasonable conditions to be fixed by the trial judge.

Ratio Decidendi: In deciding bail, courts must apply a humane, liberty-oriented discretion, giving weight to investigation conduct, risk of abscondence or interference, antecedents, and the need to avoid illusory or oppressive conditions of release.

---