Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the admission of the section 9 application and the resulting corporate insolvency resolution process should be interfered with after settlement and full payment of the operational creditor's dues.
Analysis: The parties placed on record that the settlement amount had been finalised and paid, and the operational creditor confirmed receipt of the entire payment. In these circumstances, continuation of the corporate insolvency resolution process served no further purpose. The pending requirement regarding payment of Rs. 2 lakh to the interim resolution professional was directed to be made by the operational creditor within the stipulated time towards fee and expenses.
Conclusion: The impugned order admitting the section 9 application was set aside and the corporate insolvency resolution process was closed, in favour of the appellant.