Section 482 application dismissed in money laundering case involving fraudulent land deals of Housing Co-operative Societies

HC dismissed application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in money laundering case involving fraudulent sale and purchase of land belonging to two Housing Co-operative Societies. Court held applicant's involvement prima facie falls within Section 3 of PML Act. Under Sections 22 and 24 of PML Act, presumption exists that proceeds of crime were involved in money transaction and burden lies on accused to prove innocence. Court ruled no clean chit could be given at this stage and applicant must prove innocence during trial.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the quashment of a prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, concerning allegations of fraud in the sale and purchase of land by several individuals. The main issue revolves around the applicant's alleged involvement in the money laundering activities connected to the proceeds of crime.

Details of the Judgment:
Issue 1: Allegations of Fraud in Sale and Purchase of Land
The case involves multiple FIRs registered against individuals for fraudulent activities related to the sale and purchase of land belonging to Housing Co-operative Societies. The accused, including the applicant, are alleged to have committed fraud by selling plots to unauthorized parties, transferring funds, and opening unauthorized accounts, thus defrauding the societies and rightful owners of the land.

Issue 2: Prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act
The investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act revealed instances of money laundering connected to the fraudulent land transactions. The applicant, among others, was accused of knowingly assisting in the disposal, concealment, possession, and acquisition of proceeds of crime, which are punishable under Sections 3 and 4 of the PML Act. The prosecution complaint was filed against the applicant and others before the Special Court constituted under the PML Act.

Summary of Judgment:
The applicant sought quashment of the prosecution complaint under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, arguing the lack of essential ingredients to establish the offense of money laundering against him. However, the court found that the applicant's involvement in the fraudulent activities, including transferring funds and assisting in concealing the proceeds of crime, fell within the purview of Section 3 of the PML Act. The burden of proving innocence lies with the applicant during trial, and the presumption of involvement in money laundering transactions applies unless proven otherwise. Therefore, the court dismissed the present M.Cr.C., indicating that no clean chit could be given to the applicant at this stage, emphasizing the need to establish innocence during the trial proceedings.

---